{"id":1166,"date":"2015-03-22T12:26:22","date_gmt":"2015-03-22T12:26:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/taxtraxsoftware.com\/?page_id=1166"},"modified":"2025-08-28T16:27:02","modified_gmt":"2025-08-28T16:27:02","slug":"academicresearch","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/academicresearch\/","title":{"rendered":"Academic Research"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"theoretical-research-img\" class=\"et_pb_section features-page-image et_section_regular\" style='background-color:#ffffff;'>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_2\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h2>Swanson Reed&#8217;s Academic Research<\/h2>\n<p>TaxTrex was the result of <a href=\"https:\/\/academicjournals.org\/journal\/JAT\/article-full-text-pdf\/BC5836D60083%20%20\">academic research published in the Journal of Accounting and Taxation <\/a> into the R&amp;D claim process. It was designed specifically to help accountants and their clients document the R&amp;D process in line with the requirements of CRA and recent case law.<\/p>\n<p class=\"fontsize-14px\">R&amp;D tax relief requires the taxpayer to document the experimental process and the new knowledge generated. These strict requirements have increased the administrative burden of the entire R&amp;D process.<\/p>\n<p>TaxTrex was designed to provide a simple and systematic alternative for companies wishing to claim. Three surveys, completed in real-time, prompt the taxpayer to document the following information:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The level of knowledge at the commencement of the project<\/li>\n<li>The new knowledge generated through experimental activities and their outcomes<\/li>\n<li>That the purpose of all activities was to generate new knowledge<\/li>\n<li>The relationship between the R&amp;D activities and any qualifying indirect activities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"fontsize-14px\">Each of the items above has proven to be essential to any R&amp;D tax relief claim.<\/p>\n<p class=\"fontsize-14px\">This research was published in a leading tax journal, <a href=\"https:\/\/academicjournals.org\/journal\/JAT\/article-full-text-pdf\/BC5836D60083%20%20\">Journal of Accounting and Taxation.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_2\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/AezNgd2dFak\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Taxtrex-final-pic.bmp\" alt=\"\" class=\"et-waypoint et_pb_image et_pb_animation_off grapg-img\" \/><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/academicjournals.org\/journal\/JAT\/article-full-text-pdf\/BC5836D60083%20\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/03\/pdf.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"et-waypoint et_pb_image et_pb_animation_left\" \/><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h3><strong>The Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&amp;ED) Tax Incentive Program <\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&amp;ED) Tax Incentive Program rewards Canadian taxpayers for engaging in research and development (R&amp;D) activities within Canada. All Canadian businesses, regardless of size and industry, are eligible for the program, provided that the R&amp;D work conducted meets the requirements of the SR&amp;ED definition as outlined in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act. This defines SR&amp;ED as a \u201csystematic investigation or search that is carried out in a field of science or technology by means of experiment or analysis\u201d (Canada Revenue Agency, 2017).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SR&amp;ED tax incentives have historically offered extensive benefits to Canadian taxpayers, encouraging domestic innovation and business growth. However, like Australia, the U.S and the U.K, the Canadian Government is currently under pressure to increase tax revenues while maintaining constituent satisfaction and local business support. As such CRA has been cleverly using the judicial system to defend its increasingly more narrow definition of SR&amp;ED expenditure by using the often vague and ambiguous substantiation issue.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In recent years, a number of court cases have been handed down in favor of the Government on the basis that the taxpayer did not have sufficient documentation to substantiate an SR&amp;ED claim. It is now generally accepted that that CRA will deny SR&amp;ED expenditure or activities where a taxpayer has not kept clear and relevant documentation.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>ARE YOU ELEGIBLE?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/insights\/ai\/research-tax-credit\/are-you-eligible-1\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-39836 aligncenter\" title=\"R&amp;D Tax Credit Eligibility AI Tool\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/RD-Tax-Credit-Eligibility-AI-Tool-300x229.jpg\" alt=\"R&amp;D Tax Credit Eligibility AI Tool\" width=\"392\" height=\"261\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>WHY CHOOSE US?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/about-us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11228 aligncenter\" title=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Swanson-Reed-Specialist-RD-Tax-Credit-Advisors-is-the-largest-in-the-United-States.jpg\" alt=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" width=\"392\" height=\"261\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>PASS AN AUDIT?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/insights\/ai\/research-tax-credit\/audit-checklist-original\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11228 aligncenter\" title=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/RD-Tax-Credit-Audit-Checklist-Tool.jpg\" alt=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" width=\"392\" height=\"261\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h3><strong>OVERVIEW OF SR&amp;ED CRITERIA<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To qualify as SR&amp;ED, a research activity must satisfy the following five questions (Tax Court of Canada, 2017):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Was there a technological risk or uncertainty that routine engineering or standard procedures could not remove?<\/li>\n<li>Did the person claiming to do SR&amp;ED formulate hypotheses specifically aimed at reducing or eliminating that technological uncertainty?<\/li>\n<li>Is the procedure adopted in accordance with the total discipline of the scientific method including the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses?<\/li>\n<li>Did the process result in technological advancement?<\/li>\n<li>Was a detailed record of the tested hypotheses and results kept as the work progressed?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) strongly emphasizes the importance of keeping supporting evidence to substantiate SR&amp;ED claims and ensure eligibility (CRA, 2015a). As of 2013, a penalty of $1,000 per SR&amp;ED claim was incorporated into the Income Tax Act, if requested information on a tax preparer\u201fs claim form was found missing, incomplete, or inaccurate (CRA, 2015b). Evidently, it is essential that tax preparers are diligent in providing the necessary documentation in support of their SR&amp;ED claims. Taxpayers can benefit from the SR&amp;ED Tax Incentive Program in two ways:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>SR&amp;ED expenditures can be deducted from income for tax purposes<\/li>\n<li>Taxable income, as calculated under Part I of the Income Tax Act, can be reduced using the SR&amp;ED investment tax credit and remaining credit may be refunded in some cases.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Canadian-controlled private and other corporations, individuals, trusts, and partnerships are all eligible for the SR&amp;ED investment tax credits (ITC), although there are different credit rates depending on the nature of the taxpayer. For eligible SR&amp;ED expenditures that do not exceed $3 million, Canadian-controlled private corporations are eligible for a 100% refundable ITC at a rate of 35% of expenditures. For amounts that surpass the $3 million threshold, Canadian-controlled private corporations are eligible for a non-refundable ITC at the basic rate of 15% of expenditures. In some cases, these corporations could earn a 40% refundable ITC at the basic rate of 15% of expenditure amounts that exceeded the $3 million threshold. Individual proprietorships, trusts, and other corporations can earn an ITC at the basic rate of 15% on eligible SR&amp;ED expenditures. For individuals and trusts, this amount is refundable whereas it is nonrefundable for other corporations. Since a partnership is not a taxpayer, partnerships\u201f ITC amounts are calculated at the level of partner and then allocated to eligible members. In sum, all business types in Canada have the potential to benefit from the SR&amp;ED tax incentive program.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>NEVER MISS A DEADLINE AGAIN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/insights\/ai\/research-tax-credit\/rd-tax-credit-filing-deadline-extension-calculator\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-11228 aligncenter\" title=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Form-1120-and-6765-RD-Tax-Credit-Deadline.jpg\" alt=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" width=\"392\" height=\"261\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__type\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>STAY UP TO DATE ON IRS PROCESSES<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/about-us\/research-tax-credit-consulting\/for-accountants\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-7031 aligncenter\" title=\"bigstock Image of two young businessmen 521093561 300x200\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Continuing-Education-CPA-and-RD-Tax-Credits.jpg\" width=\"503\" height=\"336\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__type\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>DISCOVER R&amp;D IN YOUR INDUSTRY<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/insights\/research-tax-credit-case-studies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-5937 aligncenter\" title=\"case studies\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/RD-Tax-Credit-Case-Studies.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<div class=\"content-block__type\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_2\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>CASE LAW<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The CRA uses documentation as a key means of determining and, in some cases, challenging technological eligibility of a claim for the SR&amp;ED program. According to a Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance (CATA) report, the federal government reduced innovation funding by $4.7 billion between 2009 and 2016 (Canadian Advanced Technology Alliance, 2016). Yet, companies engaging in SR&amp;ED should be not be discouraged by this reduction in funding since they can still access the benefits of SR&amp;ED credits, provided they are able to properly substantiate their SR&amp;ED claims. While the CRA does not offer strict guidelines as to what can be used as supporting evidence, recent legal cases emphasize the importance of accurately and clearly documenting SR&amp;ED activities. If substantial evidence cannot be presented when requested, the SR&amp;ED claim will likely be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In 1997, a landmark ruling in<em> Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Limited v. The Queen<\/em> (Tax Court of Canada, 2017) stated that \u201ctechnological advancement\u201d was synonymous with \u201cadvancements in general understanding\u201d. From this ruling, the \u201cSR&amp;ED Five Questions\u201d test was established to determine the eligibility of an SR&amp;ED claim. It maintained the utility of detailed records of hypotheses, tests, and results in providing sufficient evidence of SR&amp;ED and strengthening an SR&amp;ED claim. Joel Theatrical Rigging (JTR) Contractors (1980) Ltd. v. and The Queen (TCC, 2017) discussed the criteria of scientific eligibility. In this case, JTR contested the CRA\u201fs refusal of its SR&amp;ED projects. Their claim had been rejected on the basis that it did not meet the \u201cscientific eligibility\u201d criteria. The court sided with the CRA, finding that JTR\u201fs projects did not fall under this category. The court stated, \u201cTo constitute SR&amp;ED, a particular project must address a problem or a type of uncertainty (typically described in the jurisprudence as \u201etechnical risk or uncertainty\u201f or \u201etechnological uncertainty\u201f) that cannot be resolved by routine engineering or standard procedures (TCC, 2017).\u201d The court provided some of the following arguments when determining scientific eligibility of SR&amp;ED activities:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>The project did not appear to be carried out by competent professionals with technical diplomas or experience in mechanical or hydraulic design. \u201c\u2026the research teams did not include any professional engineers or researchers who held a university degree in engineering&#8230;(TCC, 2017)\u201d<\/li>\n<li>There was a lack of testing that formed one or more hypothesis. The judge used the definition: \u201c&#8230;a hypothesis is a statement to be tested by an experiment or a trial (TCC, 2017).\u201d<\/li>\n<li>There was a lack of a thorough experimental process.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For example, during trials, the rate of the curtain\u201fs descent was not measured:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cIt seems that if the scientific method had been used (that is, if there had been systematic observation, measurement and experiment), Mr. Marineau and his colleagues would have determined the precise weight used in the experiments and would have precisely measured the duration of the descent in each experiment so that they could determine whether, as they moved from one experiment to the next, the duration of the descent was increasing or decreasing (TCC, 2017).\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As such, it can be inferred that a project with an identifiable hypothesis (even if implicit) and at least some level scientific thoroughness, such as a process of measuring, can distinguish a systematic scientific investigation from a \u201ctrial and error\u201d process. Proper record keeping could have distinguished the systematic process from random \u201ctrial and error\u201d by clearly outlining hypotheses and potential designs, results from testing and experiments, and modifications to original designs based on testing results. In the case of JTR, the research team failed to keep records tracking the progression of work. They did not know even the exact weight of the curtain or the duration of the experiment, and the lack of documentation meant they could not prove that their work fulfilled the criterion of \u201cscientific eligibility\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Jentel Manufacturing Ltd. v. The Queen<\/em> (TCC, 2011), Justice D&#8217;Arcy dismissed the case of Jentel on appeal on the grounds that their claim for the SR&amp;ED credit did not prove technological risk or advancement. In this case, the court found that none of Jentel\u201fs activities constituted eligibility for SR&amp;ED.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Justice D&#8217;Arcy&#8217;s ruling asserted two important points:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Jentel had indeed provided evidence by means of sufficient documentation and records showing they had undertaken a \u201csystematic investigation\u201d;<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, although it was established that Jentel had undertaken a systematic investigation, there was no documentation or evidence to prove that it was undertaken with technological uncertainty to achieve technological advancement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_2\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The failure of the Jentel case was largely due to the taxpayer relying on a SAF (Statement of Agreed Facts), which is a record of facts agreed upon between the taxpayer and Crown, so there is no need for evidence to prove the facts later on. However, the SAF limits the amount of information that can be interpreted by a presiding judge. This heavy emphasis on the SAF as opposed to other forms of documentation cost Jentel a favourable outcome from the trial (TCC, 2011).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the one hand, in special circumstances, oral testimony could also suffice as evidence in defending a claim when there is a noticeable absence of documentation. In 1998\u201fs <em>RIS Christie v Canada<\/em> (Canadian Legal Information Institute, 1998) case, Judge J.A. Robertson ruled in favour of the taxpayer on appeal, noting that while the taxpayer lacked adequate documentation, the oral evidence provided by expert witnesses in subsequent investigations was sufficient to prove the existence of technological advancement and thereby confirmed that SR&amp;ED had taken place. Similarly, in <em>ACSIS EHR (Electronic Health Record) Inc. v. The Queen<\/em> (TCC, 2016), a taxpayer appealed the disallowance of the SR&amp;ED credit and used the testimony of four witnesses in support of the appeal. The Tax Court of Canada ruled in favour of the taxpayer despite their documentation not being as detailed as generally required because of appropriate oral testimony provided.<\/p>\n<p>As Justice Archambault stated in <em>116736 Canada Inc. v. The Queen<\/em> (TCC, 1998) stated:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cHowever, the Act and the Regulations do not require that such written reports be produced in order for a taxpayer to qualify for the deduction of such expenditures: it is possible to adduce evidence by way of oral testimony. Whether the Minister or a judge could conclude that the activities purported to have been carried out by the taxpayer were actually carried out then becomes a question of credibility.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These cases assert that oral testimony can offer viable support for an SR&amp;ED claim, if the evidence meets the SR&amp;ED Five Questions. This entails that witnesses who provide the evidence must be credible, namely either technical or scientific experts in their field, and must prove that the project encompassed technological uncertainty and resulted in advance. Moreover, to prevent the risk of an initial unfavourable claim outcome and avoid a subsequent challenge, which may be more costly than the worth of the SR&amp;ED claim itself, taxpayers are encouraged to engage in the practice of record keeping and documentation to substantiate that they have met the SR&amp;ED criteria. At the same time, documentation does not inherently guarantee a successful SR&amp;ED claim. Rather, as recent case law suggests, the quality of the documentation is also important, particularly that it must be clear, eligible, and relevant in relation to the SR&amp;ED Five Questions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Maritime-Ontario Freight Lines Limited v The Queen<\/em> (TCC, 2003), Justice Sarchuk ruled against the taxpayer Maritime-Ontario. He stated that not only are the requirements of a proper and detailed scientific experimentation to be backed up by detailed records (subject to independent verification), an acceptable level of documentation should also clearly describe the processes and how the final details were arrived at. Here, Justice Sarchuk stated that the submitted documentation was unintelligible, not only to the court, but also to any party like the CRA, and thus did not constitute supporting evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Mac &amp; Mac Hydrodemolition Services Inc. v. The Queen<\/em> (TCC, 2017), Justice David E. Graham ruled against the taxpayer\u201fs appeal on whether the expenditures of Mac and Mac qualified as SR&amp;ED expenditures. Although Mac and Mac kept sets of notes, which described the testing of various parameters, there were no notes confirming any mention of a scientific hypothesis and details were vague. Mac and Mac did not provide adequate documentation demonstrating a systematic process of hypothesis formulation, testing, and results analysis, thereby failing to fulfil requirements of the SR &amp; ED Five Questions. In the appeal\u201fs ruling, Justice Graham noted, \u201cwhile evidence of the outcome is important, it is critical to technological advancement that the rigours of adherence to the scientific and experimental method are kept on a detailed and concurrent basis with the conduct of the experiments (TCC, 2017).\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These cases reveal that supporting evidence, whether in the form of documentation or oral testimony, must corroborate the SR&amp;ED criteria in order to ensure a successful outcome of an SR&amp;ED claim or challenge. Supporting evidence must also be accurate, thorough, legible, and clear when substantiating a claim, particularly in demonstrating adherence to the SR&amp;ED Five Questions.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle et_pb_toggle_close\">\n\t\t\t<h5 class=\"et_pb_toggle_title\">ANALYSIS OF CRA GUIDENCE AND CASE LAW<\/h5>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle_content clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As the RIS Christie and ACSIS EHR cases demonstrate, documentation is not required in every circumstance. It is arguable however, that clear and relevant documentation does help to solidify a SR&amp;ED claim, the CRA or the courts should contest it. Failure to keep detailed and articulate documentation proved to be a downfall for Maritime-Ontario and Mac and Mac, as their documents were dubbed \u201cunintelligible\u201d and \u201cno notes mentioning of any hypotheses.\u201d When keeping records, it is important to ensure they are clear and concise to be devoid of any such doubts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The CRA notes that the following points are grounds for contestation if they are not addressed fully when carrying<br \/>\nout an SR&amp;ED project (CRA, 2015a):<\/p>\n<ol style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>The scientific or technological objectives of the project are not clear.<\/li>\n<li>The scientific or technological advancement is not clear, or appears to be standard practice for that industry within the claimant&#8217;s business context.<\/li>\n<li>A systematic investigation or search through experimentation or analysis is not apparent.<\/li>\n<li>The nature and extent of the work conducted in the tax period is not clear.<\/li>\n<li>Some of the claimed work does not appear to be included in the definition of SR&amp;ED in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act.<\/li>\n<li>Some of the support work claimed does not appear to be commensurate with the needs, or directly in support, of the SR&amp;ED work.<\/li>\n<li>It is not clear how the use or amount of the claimed materials relates to the claimed SR&amp;ED.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These specific guidelines were overlooked by the taxpayer in the JTR case, who was found to have conducted minimal testing, lacked consultation with certified experts in the field, and had no detailed records or documentation to show a thorough experimentation process. The same can be said for the Jentel case, where the taxpayer could not adequately prove with documentation that there was technological uncertainty to achieve technological advancement within its SR&amp;ED project.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle_content -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle --><hr class=\"et_pb_space et_pb_divider\" style='border-color: #000000;' \/>\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>R&amp;D TAX CREDIT TRAINING FOR CPAS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-11228\" title=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/directive-for-LBI-taxpayers-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"directive for LBI taxpayers\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__type\">Upcoming Webinars<\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>R&amp;D TAX CREDIT TRAINING FOR CFPS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-7031\" title=\"bigstock Image of two young businessmen 521093561 300x200\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/RD-Tax-Credit-Consultant.jpg\" alt=\"bigstock Image of two young businessmen 521093561 300x200\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__type\">Upcoming Webinars<\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column --><div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_1_3\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>R&amp;D TAX CREDIT TRAINING FOR SMBS<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-5937\" title=\"water tech\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/water-tech-300x198.jpg\" alt=\"water tech\" width=\"300\" height=\"198\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<div class=\"content-block__type\">Upcoming Webinars<\/div>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>CASE STUDY <\/strong><\/h3>\n<blockquote>\n<h4><strong>LAWBOT, INC.<\/strong><\/h4>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text --><div class=\"et_pb_accordion\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle et_pb_toggle_open\">\n\t\t\t<h5 class=\"et_pb_toggle_title\">Business Scenario<\/h5>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle_content clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Qualified Research Activities (QRAs) and Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) are the two parts that make up the SR&amp;ED Tax Credit. The purpose of this case study, using a fictional company, LawBot, Inc., is to determine what does and does not qualify as eligible activities and expenses, in light of the CRA\u201fs \u201cFive Question Test\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">LawBot, Inc. is a developer of streamlined, businessfocused solutions using data analytics and machine learning. It aims to advance the functionality, utility and efficacy of software solutions by employing Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) strategies. In the tax year being claimed, LawBot, Inc. undertook research activities to develop a new legal search engine using machine learning. Historically, search engines used in the legal industry have been cumbersome, difficult to use, counter-intuitive and inefficient. LawBot, Inc. sought to streamline the legal research process by introducing machine learning, allowing for faster retrieval of information more accurately and reliably. The four stages of product development undertaken in this project are outlined in Table 1.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle_content -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle --><div class=\"et_pb_toggle et_pb_toggle_close\">\n\t\t\t<h5 class=\"et_pb_toggle_title\">Analysis of Activities<\/h5>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle_content clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Figure 1 outlines the relationship between technological information (L) discovered by LawBot, Inc. over the time (T) of the project. It is also worth mentioning that Figure 1 is contrasted to Table 1.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Table 1.<\/strong> Software development activities for LawBot, Inc&#8217;s projects<\/p>\n<table width=\"802\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"80\"><strong>S\/N<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\"><strong>Activity<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"563\"><strong>Description<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">I<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">Research of existing technological information\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (ineligible activity)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"563\">Idea to develop a web-based, comprehensive legal search engine using machine learning and Artificial Intelligence is conceptualized. Gap in the existing legal research market is identified. This stage consists of literature reviews of machine learning methodologies, consumer surveys, and researching past technologies that may offer similar, albeit limited, functionality.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">II<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">Economic evaluation<br \/>\n(ineligible activity)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"563\">Before continuing with its projects, LawBot, Inc. identifies the risks associated with its developments. The company will decide whether to continue with the projects or terminate them based on its economic evaluation and risk assessment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">III<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">Prototyping and trialing (QRA)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"563\">LawBot, Inc. engages in a systematic process of experimentation where it undergoes an iterative development process. This involves developing one or more hypotheses drawn from academic research. As LawBot, Inc. is one of the first companies to apply machine learning for the legal industry, the company must test and trial theories developed from academia to determine if they are effective and applicable to LawBot\u201fs niche industry. From these theories, LawBot develops a model to train the algorithm to retrieve legal information quickly and accurately. The model is tested and evaluated. From testing results, it is found that there are limits to the suggestions found in academic practice. The model is modified and refined according to performance, processing speed, relevancy, and consistency. Further testing is conducted to improve the model with changes made to the algorithm and methodology. Since machine learning is under-developed and given the limitations in existing academic research, LawBot is able to advance the technological knowledgebase from its experiments.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">IV<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">Commercial production\u00a0 \u00a0 (ineligible activity)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"563\">Latest design is accepted and the software is ready to be passed on to consumer markets. This phase also requires maintaining the software, as it is never a perfect, final product; the coding will change to keep up with new and advancing legal developments as well as long term maintenance of the database.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Over the course of its software projects, LawBot, Inc. encountered four progressive information stages:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>(1) Point L0<\/strong> = LawBot, Inc.\u201fs technological knowledge before the project commenced;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>(2) Point L1<\/strong> = research required before ensuing the software project;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>(3) Point L2<\/strong> = through a systematic process of experimentation, the knowledge gained through LawBot\u201fs prototyping and trialing activities, that is, testing, analysing, hypothesizing, modeling, simulation; and<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>(4) Point L3<\/strong> = the information that was culled from LawBot\u201fs prototyping and trialing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Activity I<\/strong>: Research of Existing Technological Information Because this activity refers to existing technology and the building of a knowledgebase rather than the generation of new knowledge, this first activity is not considered a QRA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As shown in Figure 1 from point L0 to L1, LawBot, Inc. gained technological insight due to its research. However, given that the nature of this research is not new or groundbreaking, it does not qualify as a QRA as outlined by the CRA. Although this activity does not qualify as a QRA, documentation may be generated, thus it can later be used to substantiate a claim should an audit be conducted by the CRA.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Activity II:<\/strong> Economic evaluation As outlined in Figure 1, this activity does not qualify as a QRA. Economic evaluation and risk assessment is not an activity that generates new technological information, but simply refers to business objectives and thus cannot be classed as R&amp;D as it does not meet the \u201cFive Question Test\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Activity III:<\/strong> Prototyping and trialing Due to the experimental nature of the prototyping and trialing period, LawBot, Inc.\u201fs activities during this stage meet the CRA\u201fs \u201cFive Question Test\u201d. New knowledge is generated and technical advance is achieved. Expenses incurred during this stage of the production process can be eligible for the SR&amp;ED tax credit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Activity IV:<\/strong> Commercial production Commercial production, the passing of the software to consumer markets, does not generate new technological information or involve experimentation, thus does not meet the CRA\u201fs \u201cFive Question Test,\u201d and therefore cannot to be classed as a QRA.<\/p>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle_content -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle --><div class=\"et_pb_toggle et_pb_toggle_close\">\n\t\t\t<h5 class=\"et_pb_toggle_title\">Detailed Analysis of the Activities<\/h5>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_toggle_content clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Out of the four activities mentioned in Table1, only one qualifies as a QRA: Activity III, Prototyping and Trialing. This analysis will detail how LawBot, Inc. met the CRA\u201fs \u201cFive Part Test\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-12590 size-medium\" title=\"coding-1853305_960_720-1\" src=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Captura-de-pantalla-2025-08-20-092048.png\" alt=\"Automation-1\" width=\"692\" height=\"540\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"content-block__body\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle_content -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_toggle -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_accordion --><div class=\"et_pb_tabs\">\n\t\t\t<ul class=\"et_pb_tabs_controls clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"et_pb_tab_active\"><a href=\"#\">Part. 1<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#\">Part. 2<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#\">Part. 3<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#\">Part. 4<\/a><\/li><li><a href=\"#\">Part. 5<\/a><\/li>\n\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_all_tabs\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_tab clearfix et_pb_active_content\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>1. Was there any technological risk or uncertainty which routine engineering or standard procedure could not remove?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In Activity III, Prototyping and Trialing, the process of developing software solutions using data analytics and AI was not straightforward and encompassed technological risk. While a growing field, AI methodology currently exists more so in theoretical research papers than real-life business applications. Given that most of AI is theory, there was no guarantee that the outcomes suggested in theory could be applicable in real-world contexts. Routine engineering and standard procedure testing were not sufficient to eliminate the technological uncertainties surrounding LawBot\u201fs software solutions. It was determined that, to eliminate uncertainties, LawBot, Inc. had to engage in a systematic process of experimentation and testing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Documentation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The purpose of documentation for this stage is to establish the existing industry benchmark or knowledgebase, and to substantiate how the company\u201fs activities advance or go beyond this benchmark. Documentation for this phase of software development included literature reviews, background research, and development plans to name a few. Although these forms of documentation are not related to QRAs, they could be used in the event of an audit.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tab --><div class=\"et_pb_tab clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>2. Did the person\/business claiming to do SR&amp;ED formulate hypotheses specifically aimed at reducing or eliminating that technological uncertainty?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">LawBot aimed to develop a comprehensive legal search engine that was more accurate, reliable, and intuitive than what currently exists on the market. This involved the formulation of hypotheses specifically aimed at reducing uncertainties related to feasibility, methodology, and design. From research, brainstorming, feasibility studies, and analyses, LawBot identified the best design options that will undergo testing and evaluation. During this stage, exact technical uncertainties and risks are determined whilst potential solutions or hypotheses are developed.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tab --><div class=\"et_pb_tab clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>3. Is the procedure adopted in accordance with the total discipline of the scientific method including the formulation, testing and modification of hypotheses?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The projects that were undertaken by LawBot, Inc. did meet the requirements of the scientific method, that is, formulation, testing and modification of hypotheses. The company\u201fs formulation of hypotheses was spurred from its research of already existing, but limited, technologies (Activity I). The company, from the outset, wanted to develop a legal search engine, and had to implement the elements of the scientific method since no comparable software existed anywhere in the market. In order to create tangible software products, hypotheses were formulated based on the academic and theoretical research. Once the projects were dubbed as financially sound (Activity II), testing of the hypotheses then ensued. This included testing and retesting codes and algorithms, which ultimately lead to the modification of the hypotheses in order to produce products (Activity III) that were to an acceptable industry standard before they could be released to a mass market (Activity IV).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Documentation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Documentation for this phase is imperative to substantiating the SR&amp;ED claim. Documents must be able to demonstrate the existence of technological uncertainties and risks and the progression of work to eliminate these uncertainties. The exact documents will vary from industry to industry. For example, tangible evidence of SR&amp;ED activities could include conceptual sketches, various screenshots over time, images of prototypes during testing, email correspondence between technical personnel, meeting notes, and others. To substantiate QREs, timesheets, invoices, general ledgers, and other accounting information may be used, provided the personnel and supplies are directly related to the experiments.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tab --><div class=\"et_pb_tab clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>4. Did the process result in technological advancement?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In reference to Activities I to III, the generation of new knowledge increases as time progresses, thus LawBot, Inc.\u201fs project lead to technological advancement. To develop its software solution, the company had to start with researching technological information that already exists. Upon discovering that AI is mostly theoretical and is a new concept, very few examples of comparable products existed in the market, especially for legal research. The limitations of existing technologies and gaps in the technological knowledgebase were therefore identified. This progressed to Activity II, whereby the company considered the economic risk, viability, and potential profitability before committing to the project. Once the project passed the company\u201fs economic evaluation, LawBot proceeded to Activity III during which hypotheses were formulated, tested, and modified. Advance was achieved at this stage since new knowledge was generated from experimentation and testing. The technological advancement relied on the principles of the hard sciences, particularly engineering and computer science. After the experimentation process is complete, commercial production of the legal search engine is carried out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Documentation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Technological advance can be substantiated from records that describe the project\u201fs objectives and the experimentation process. This includes electronic project boards showing progress at all stages of work, design documents of source code, testing protocols, and other project records. Documentation is key to identifying technological advance because it can prove and confirm the existence of progress and new knowledge gained from experimentation, including failures and successes.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tab --><div class=\"et_pb_tab clearfix\">\n\t\t\t\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>5. Was a detailed record of the tested hypotheses and results kept as the work progressed?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As work progressed on its software projects, LawBot, Inc. was able to keep various detailed records of the hypotheses that were tested, as well as the results of its testing. This information is critical, particularly if the company were to be audited by the CRA. For example, as the work progressed, the company saved the following: literature reviews, background research, project records, design documents for system architecture and source code, conceptual sketches, testing protocols, results or analysis from testing\/trial runs, development plans, screenshots of various build versions\/final version, records of resource allocation, invoices, and electronic project boards showing progress at all stages of LawBot, Inc.\u201fs software development. As shown by various examples throughout this paper, culling various project documents can be critical to the survival of an R&amp;D project in the event of an audit to substantiate that the projects carried out do qualify as SR&amp;ED.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tab -->\n\t\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_all_tabs -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_tabs --><hr class=\"et_pb_space et_pb_divider\" style='border-color: #000000;' \/>\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p><strong>R&amp;D Tax Credit Preparation Services<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Swanson Reed is one of the only companies in the United States to exclusively focus on R&amp;D tax credit preparation. Swanson Reed provides state and federal R&amp;D tax credit preparation and audit services to all 50 states.<\/p>\n<p>If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call or <a href=\"mailto:adam@swansonreed.org\">email<\/a> our CEO, Damian Smyth on <a href=\"tel:+18009864725\">(800) 986-4725<\/a>. Feel free to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/about-us\/research-tax-credit-consulting\/book-a-call-with-us\">book a quick teleconference<\/a> with one of our national R&amp;D tax credit specialists at a time that is convenient for you.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text --><div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<p><strong>Swanson Reed&#8217;s R&amp;D Tax Credit Audit Advisory Services<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/about-us\/research-tax-credit-consulting\/audit-defense\/creditarmor\/\">creditARMOR<\/a> is a sophisticated R&amp;D tax credit insurance and AI-driven risk management platform. It mitigates audit exposure by covering defense expenses, including CPA, tax attorney, and specialist consultant fees\u2014delivering robust, compliant support for R&amp;D credit claims. \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.irs.gov\">Click here <\/a> for more information about R&amp;amp;D tax credit management and implementation.<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text --><hr class=\"et_pb_space et_pb_divider\" style='border-color: #000000;' \/>\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row --><div class=\"et_pb_row\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"et_pb_text et_pb_bg_layout_light et_pb_text_align_left\">\n\t\t\t\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>CHOOSE YOUR STATE<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"map maphilighted alignleft\" style=\"display: block; position: relative; z-index: 2; opacity: 1;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/map-usa-new1.png\" alt=\"find-us-map\" usemap=\"#findusmap\" width=\"1030\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; z-index: 1;\" src=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/map-usa-s.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1030\" \/><\/p>\n<map id=\"findusmap\" name=\"findusmap\">\n<area coords=\"43,12,53,19,63,22,68,25,69,29,68,31,72,32,68,32,72,34,71,25,72,23,69,16,73,15,72,12,73,3,96,10,133,17,156,22,146,79,145,87,126,84,112,82,102,84,91,83,88,82,81,83,75,80,67,80,57,77,54,68,54,64,52,63,40,59,43,61,42,60,38,57,42,52,41,52,42,48,40,46,41,44,41,40,42,34,40,27,41,23,40,20,41,15\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/washington\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"40,56,49,61,54,65,54,71,55,75,65,81,73,78,80,83,87,83,93,83,108,82,120,82,133,85,147,84,146,88,152,97,147,100,144,107,143,109,142,112,136,116,135,120,134,125,138,128,135,136,133,151,128,175,80,166,11,149,10,143,13,136,12,128,20,117,28,96\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/oregon\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"155,22,170,24,168,45,169,52,169,58,174,65,180,74,187,80,184,86,183,91,184,95,181,97,180,99,184,105,189,101,191,104,192,113,195,118,195,121,200,123,200,127,204,131,207,130,211,131,216,129,220,131,226,131,228,128,231,133,226,189,176,183,127,174,137,129,139,125,134,124,136,118,140,113,143,111,144,105,149,99,152,96,149,92,146,88,146,83,146,72,150,48\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/idaho\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"11,149,80,166,66,231,143,335,147,347,149,352,143,359,141,365,138,370,135,377,137,379,138,385,134,387,89,383,86,376,87,369,79,358,72,353,72,353,70,348,68,344,64,345,58,341,55,334,47,332,39,330,34,325,34,319,36,313,32,312,34,307,30,301,22,284,20,278,24,272,22,267,18,264,16,254,18,250,16,252,16,248,19,248,16,248,17,246,11,241,11,235,4,218,4,209,6,198,1,185,2,178,8,171,11,162\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/california\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"129,390,137,385,140,384,136,377,139,369,142,364,143,357,149,353,141,336,143,330,143,319,145,309,151,311,153,316,157,312,160,293,248,304,235,430,196,427\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/arizona\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"79,165,129,174,176,183,158,310,154,316,151,311,145,310,144,317,144,325,144,337,141,333,66,232\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/nevada\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"177,183,224,189,223,212,255,215,248,305,161,293\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/utah\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"248,304,302,308,354,311,353,321,352,322,348,422,283,418,282,424,253,422,252,432,234,431\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/new-mexico\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"255,215,322,220,373,221,370,312,248,305\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/colorado\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"233,123,287,128,343,130,339,220,265,216,222,211\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/wyoming\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"172,25,235,34,300,40,347,43,343,131,281,127,234,123,232,133,227,129,224,131,218,132,213,130,211,130,205,131,203,132,197,123,196,121,196,117,192,110,192,103,191,100,185,105,179,100,181,98,184,94,184,88,185,84,187,81,181,80,182,75,175,66,170,60,169,52,167,47,169,38,170,30\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/montana\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"348,43,395,44,448,44,450,60,454,71,455,86,457,98,460,111,401,111,345,110\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/north-dakota\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"344,110,408,111,459,111,457,117,460,123,462,125,462,132,464,164,462,167,463,172,462,178,461,182,464,187,455,181,448,180,442,180,440,182,429,178,341,177,343,135\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/south-dakota\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"341,175,429,178,439,182,446,180,454,181,461,186,466,188,469,197,471,205,473,209,474,214,476,221,475,225,478,230,482,236,485,242,468,243,444,245,370,245,373,222,338,221\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/nebraska\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"371,245,432,244,485,242,489,245,493,245,494,247,491,251,493,255,498,258,500,260,502,308,439,311,371,311\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/kansas\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"354,311,432,312,501,309,503,320,507,345,509,384,495,378,491,379,487,379,483,380,478,381,473,383,466,382,467,381,464,380,459,384,458,380,454,381,450,380,446,381,444,381,442,377,437,376,434,376,432,376,422,374,419,370,416,370,406,369,406,366,406,323,352,323\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/oklahoma\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"353,321,406,323,406,367,414,369,421,372,428,375,434,375,440,375,444,377,445,381,451,378,457,380,459,381,465,380,468,380,473,383,476,380,484,379,495,377,502,380,510,383,517,383,520,415,523,423,525,427,529,434,529,440,528,449,528,453,528,459,527,465,525,468,524,471,522,473,521,474,517,476,516,475,513,479,510,480,506,484,501,489,491,496,487,496,486,498,485,498,484,498,481,503,480,503,478,503,478,501,476,505,470,508,467,511,467,512,467,512,468,512,465,513,463,518,460,522,460,523,460,528,457,527,458,529,459,534,461,542,462,546,464,555,460,558,453,555,444,554,433,550,425,547,418,533,417,525,414,521,401,504,395,492,390,485,379,472,368,472,363,471,362,471,357,472,350,483,344,489,332,484,322,475,315,466,313,456,307,449,295,437,287,428,282,422,283,419,349,421\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/texas\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"518,397,545,395,570,394,572,397,573,402,577,406,576,409,573,411,573,415,571,420,567,425,567,429,566,433,566,438,602,435,600,441,607,451,611,456,611,457,606,456,614,459,610,455,611,457,610,460,607,463,606,468,622,473,618,473,621,477,614,478,609,474,605,473,604,469,598,473,601,476,599,478,594,475,590,474,588,478,583,479,577,477,578,472,574,470,570,468,571,470,568,469,569,470,567,470,565,470,566,471,561,472,555,472,551,472,546,470,538,470,525,470,527,462,527,449,530,441,518,421\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/louisiana\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"503,320,542,318,581,314,584,318,578,324,592,324,589,327,585,331,585,336,584,341,584,345,583,348,581,351,579,356,578,361,575,364,572,367,572,370,570,376,569,382,569,389,572,391,572,394,543,395,517,397,517,385,509,385\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/arkansas\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"479,229,510,229,531,226,544,225,551,230,551,237,555,245,563,252,568,257,569,261,572,259,576,260,577,264,575,269,574,271,574,275,579,278,584,283,589,285,592,290,591,296,596,301,599,304,598,309,594,312,591,318,591,323,579,324,584,317,581,314,553,316,520,319,502,320,500,272,498,260,491,253,493,246,493,244,484,243\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/missouri\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"584,345,596,346,610,344,621,343,623,412,626,429,628,446,623,448,614,449,611,448,608,452,602,444,601,435,584,437,566,440,567,426,571,416,576,406,573,401,569,391,570,381,573,365\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/mississippi\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"593,310,619,310,618,305,687,298,729,290,730,295,726,298,725,301,721,301,717,306,717,304,712,308,710,311,701,317,694,322,693,326,691,333,691,333,653,339,623,343,599,347,584,345,585,331,590,327\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/tennessee\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"593,312,619,309,618,306,658,301,697,296,706,286,713,278,721,271,707,257,707,252,704,249,699,246,696,249,689,249,687,250,681,249,677,247,673,244,668,242,666,243,666,249,663,254,656,254,658,258,655,262,651,267,651,271,646,273,644,270,642,272,641,275,638,276,635,275,632,276,632,280,627,277,624,277,619,277,616,281,615,285,615,287,613,289,609,290,608,297,607,299,603,296,600,295,598,297,597,299,599,303\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/kentucky\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"448,43,478,42,477,34,482,35,486,46,493,48,501,50,507,49,515,49,518,54,522,56,523,53,528,55,533,59,539,57,543,53,551,55,556,57,562,58,555,62,550,65,545,71,526,90,525,104,523,111,520,113,522,118,520,129,523,133,530,139,539,146,543,151,548,154,548,160,509,162,463,165,462,125,455,118,461,110,458,98,454,70,451,63\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/minnesota\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"463,164,507,162,548,160,550,165,551,171,556,178,560,181,565,186,568,190,568,196,566,200,560,203,557,204,555,208,558,212,558,218,552,224,551,229,543,225,524,227,498,229,479,230,477,226,476,216,472,204,469,196,463,189,461,183,463,172\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/iowa\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"525,88,532,87,546,80,552,78,550,85,544,89,551,88,558,91,566,95,575,96,586,99,592,99,593,104,595,107,596,112,598,115,599,117,598,121,596,127,603,118,606,113,611,108,605,119,604,135,602,141,601,148,601,156,602,165,604,175,559,180,554,176,550,171,549,163,548,160,546,154,542,149,532,141,527,136,521,133,520,125,516,111,518,113,525,101\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/wisconsin\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"553,89,562,82,571,81,576,75,583,68,593,65,586,72,583,79,589,78,595,79,601,85,607,84,611,86,617,81,626,78,637,74,637,81,647,79,651,77,651,81,652,88,655,89,657,87,661,86,662,88,652,89,649,90,646,94,651,96,653,99,661,101,667,103,668,106,667,108,668,112,671,123,668,127,668,129,664,132,663,138,667,140,672,130,677,129,683,129,686,142,691,150,691,158,687,160,685,162,684,166,682,168,682,172,679,182,658,187,658,185,644,187,622,191,630,178,630,166,628,157,622,150,621,143,623,137,625,131,625,124,628,116,633,114,635,114,637,113,636,108,641,105,638,103,641,98,643,94,640,91,631,92,628,95,621,95,614,103,616,96,612,99,609,102,608,100,600,119,596,110,594,102,586,99,574,97,560,95\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/michigan\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"560,180,585,178,605,176,606,182,613,193,619,246,618,250,621,257,618,266,614,270,613,279,614,285,613,288,608,289,608,295,608,299,601,296,597,300,592,297,593,291,588,285,582,282,574,277,575,274,576,265,577,261,575,259,567,260,555,245,548,231,555,220,556,212,555,207,563,201,567,194,566,186\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/illinois\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"614,282,622,276,628,276,630,279,635,275,640,274,644,267,646,272,649,272,651,266,656,262,658,257,656,254,660,252,663,253,667,249,666,243,659,201,656,184,637,188,624,189,618,193,613,193,616,218,620,245,618,249,620,252,622,260,618,265,615,271,614,277\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/indiana\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"656,185,675,182,688,184,691,180,694,187,703,183,709,180,716,172,725,168,731,193,731,199,731,206,732,213,729,221,725,226,722,227,719,231,718,235,717,240,714,238,712,241,712,246,708,251,698,247,696,248,688,249,682,249,677,247,673,243,667,243\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/ohio\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"725,167,737,159,739,164,808,148,813,150,818,156,822,158,821,161,819,166,819,169,819,173,818,177,822,179,830,185,822,191,822,193,820,195,815,198,777,208,736,216,732,199,731,190\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/pennsylvania\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"737,158,740,165,809,147,816,156,822,158,830,160,835,168,837,169,838,173,847,170,858,163,866,155,869,151,862,152,857,158,846,158,840,169,841,160,842,157,837,137,836,122,831,102,828,101,826,92,824,84,821,74,797,81,788,91,782,104,784,110,786,118,782,120,773,127,764,128,754,129,744,133,745,141,748,143\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/new-york\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"732,195,737,216,754,214,755,223,762,217,765,212,772,213,777,209,782,212,784,217,784,220,775,215,773,219,773,223,769,229,768,231,764,230,762,241,756,239,754,245,748,258,749,263,745,267,742,268,739,271,738,273,733,274,728,275,721,272,713,266,706,258,706,251,711,248,713,240,718,239,718,234,720,229,731,221\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/west-virginia\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"756,222,768,213,774,213,776,211,779,210,785,216,792,220,799,219,798,226,795,233,797,234,801,233,805,234,811,238,814,236,810,229,808,222,810,215,807,211,808,208,810,205,811,205,809,212,811,218,815,230,818,238,819,237,821,239,826,237,821,248,824,253,826,256,829,246,831,236,834,228,832,222,823,225,815,197,801,201,781,206,760,211,754,213\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/maryland\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"794,219,799,218,799,222,794,223\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"#\" \/>\n<area coords=\"785,221,786,215,791,219,794,222,797,224,796,229,796,232,801,234,807,236,814,239,817,241,817,243,819,248,818,247,818,247,814,248,819,251,818,254,817,255,819,259,819,260,821,257,820,260,826,259,826,260,830,267,778,281,730,290,697,296,709,281,720,270,725,273,727,275,731,273,736,273,741,268,747,266,749,262,750,255,753,246,757,239,762,241,763,233,766,230,773,224,774,216\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/virginia\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"821,159,832,162,836,162,837,169,836,173,840,175,841,181,842,192,838,199,835,208,833,213,832,207,826,207,821,205,819,200,819,196,825,188,829,183,823,180,818,177,817,172,821,168,819,168\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/new-jersey\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"729,290,778,281,831,267,833,273,835,276,836,277,837,278,838,280,838,281,845,286,843,289,843,294,838,297,837,298,836,299,832,304,832,307,828,311,822,313,815,318,809,328,807,336,797,338,773,323,754,325,750,321,743,320,733,322,725,324,711,329,688,333,690,326,693,324,696,321,706,315,710,310,714,306,722,301,726,299,731,293\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/north-carolina\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"708,336,714,327,734,320,749,320,754,326,773,321,797,337,790,347,790,354,787,359,785,359,783,364,778,369,772,373,769,377,764,388,759,385,757,379,751,373,742,366,740,361,733,357,727,352,715,340\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/south-carolina\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"764,386,758,383,753,375,748,368,739,361,728,353,722,347,716,341,712,339,708,336,714,327,688,333,667,336,680,381,688,394,687,401,686,406,689,412,689,420,695,429,746,424,748,429,748,420,750,417,759,417,759,412,759,407,761,397,762,391\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/georgia\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"622,342,666,337,680,381,688,394,686,401,686,406,690,412,691,423,687,425,675,425,656,428,645,431,642,435,648,439,646,443,641,447,639,443,639,442,634,439,634,444,631,446,629,446,625,419,623,394\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/alabama\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"617,450,630,450,642,448,652,444,665,443,678,444,687,449,692,453,698,453,702,447,709,445,709,440,719,442,729,451,734,458,739,456,745,464,744,474,745,482,747,488,748,492,750,493,752,487,749,492,761,508,763,511,763,504,762,509,766,511,770,517,775,523,781,522,785,527,790,537,793,538,803,534,806,528,805,524,805,520,807,517,805,498,786,468,786,462,770,441,759,417,748,417,749,427,744,424,721,427,697,430,690,423,663,427,652,428,643,432,649,442,643,446,639,446,638,441,637,438,636,443,635,447,620,449\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/florida\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"821,73,849,65,850,72,851,76,846,84,848,90,846,97,846,103,847,111,848,120,835,123,832,104,827,98,824,83\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/vermont\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"836,122,858,117,867,114,873,108,876,111,878,112,876,116,874,119,875,120,879,120,882,124,883,127,886,129,894,128,894,124,890,121,895,129,888,133,885,135,887,136,889,139,884,140,885,136,884,132,878,135,877,136,873,132,872,129,864,131,855,134,837,138\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/massachusetts\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"841,162,852,152,868,147,864,132,838,137\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/connecticut\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"848,119,867,114,875,104,868,98,860,72,854,58,850,58,849,68,850,77,844,84,846,92,845,97,848,114\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/new-hampshire\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"875,103,876,97,880,89,883,84,887,83,890,76,894,73,903,68,902,64,905,63,906,61,909,59,911,55,917,50,918,44,914,39,911,41,908,33,900,32,894,11,890,2,881,0,875,5,865,2,870,2,865,8,860,22,859,33,861,39,859,44,861,47,858,49,857,50,857,55,854,56,867,94,872,101\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/maine\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"267,531,267,615,275,616,280,619,283,624,288,628,292,629,295,621,300,621,308,630,316,640,319,647,326,652,330,655,329,664,325,664,319,657,314,650,310,640,304,634,300,627,297,629,291,633,283,630,276,625,271,622,264,619,251,618,243,617,242,617,236,614,234,615,225,616,224,619,216,620,209,626,207,624,205,618,218,606,220,605,211,610,207,618,201,618,198,623,196,626,197,629,193,634,187,637,178,644,168,652,158,658,153,661,147,666,134,665,127,675,121,678,113,681,108,683,99,685,85,691,77,691,68,692,58,695,78,690,88,688,97,686,107,684,125,677,138,670,149,657,157,654,169,645,171,640,174,637,175,633,177,628,170,628,167,628,164,631,162,629,158,629,151,631,149,630,149,625,147,623,149,616,138,620,139,619,134,617,132,615,126,615,128,620,123,619,119,616,125,613,133,613,132,610,128,607,125,602,132,591,132,594,134,591,140,587,143,590,148,587,154,587,154,581,151,580,155,574,151,575,144,579,131,578,124,576,105,587,109,590,106,592,98,589,92,586,97,584,107,588,123,576,122,573,120,571,113,567,121,564,130,561,139,557,138,563,146,565,150,563,150,560,148,557,141,553,132,549,127,544,124,542,125,538,132,538,137,537,142,530,147,526,156,524,161,521,166,519,174,519,183,515,190,519,204,521,223,524,234,524,250,527,255,527\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/alaska\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"504,663,509,669\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/washington-d-c\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"488,655,493,659,500,662,507,665,509,672,512,674,513,677,516,682,514,687,503,690,499,694,492,701,484,698,484,686,481,674,485,666,488,655,480,642,484,640,478,635,474,633,468,633,466,629,461,630,463,625,459,624,455,624,450,623,437,619,434,616,429,609,427,605,423,609,420,611,422,617,427,619,433,619,435,616,388,599,388,594,390,590,384,588,380,589,375,591,366,594,364,596,363,600,363,600,369,597,372,595,377,598,384,600,388,599,419,609,433,618,447,622,459,631,457,633,452,633,455,638,458,639,461,635,460,631,461,630,470,642,472,645,469,644,465,644,477,643,480,642\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/hawaii\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"889,159,912,159,912,175,888,175,888,158,874,142,877,138,875,134,872,131,869,129,864,132,866,140,868,146,874,142\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/rhode-island\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"888,195,913,195,913,180,888,180,888,195,832,217,828,214,825,210,822,206,820,199,818,194,815,198,817,211,822,225,832,223,831,217\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/delaware\/\" \/>\n<area coords=\"888,200,913,200,913,216,888,216,888,200,799,220,797,217,793,217,793,222,798,223,798,220\" shape=\"poly\" href=\"http:\/\/www.swansonreed.com\/research-tax-credit\/washington-d-c\/\" \/> <\/map>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_text -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_column -->\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_row -->\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div> <!-- .et_pb_section -->\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1166","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1166","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1166"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1166\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2766,"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1166\/revisions\/2766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/taxtrex.ai\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}